source | all docs for version 0.7.pre8 | all versions | oilshell.org
Warning: Work in progress! Leave feedback on Zulip or Github if you'd like this doc to be updated.
var
to initialize variablesPython- or JavaScript- like syntax on RHS.
var myint = 1
var mystring = 'str'
var doublequoted = "hello $name"
var myarray = @(ls -a -l)
var mydict = {name: 'bob', age: 10}
var mylist = [42, false, "hello"]
setvar
or set
to mutate variablessetvar myint = 1
Spelled with set
:
shopt -s parse-set
set mylist[0] = 43
set mylist[0] += 1 # increment by 1
set mydict['name'] = 'other'
In Oil, set
is a keyword. To use the set
builtin, prefix it with builtin
:
builtin set -o errexit
builtin set -- a b c
You can also turn on set
options with the shopt -o
flag: shopt -o -s errexit
.
Expressions like these should all work. They're basically identical to Python,
except that you use the setvar
or set
keyword to change locations.
There implementation is still pretty hacky, but it's good to settle on syntax and semantics.
set x[1] = 2
set d['key'] = 3
set func_returning_list()[3] = 3
set x, y = y, x # swap
set x.foo, x.bar = foo, bar
https://github.com/oilshell/oil/commit/64e1e9c91c541e495fee4a39e5a23bc775ae3104
Future work, not implemented:
const
(compile-time?)
let
?auto
for "auto-vivifcation"proc
declares a shell-like "function"func
declares a true functionLIke Python or JavaScript.
return
is a keyword in OilIt takes an expression, not a word. See command vs. expression mode.
do
, pass
, and pp
Maybe =
too.
pass
evaluates an expression and throws away its result. It's intended to be used for left-to-right function calls. See the sub()
example in this thread:https://oilshell.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/121540-oil-discuss/topic/left-to-right.20syntax.20ideas
pp
pretty prints an expression.They both have to be keywords because they take an expression, not a bunch of words.
Unfortunately I found that do/done
in shell prevents us from adding do
:
do f(x) #can't write this
pass f(x) # it has to be this, which doesn't read as nicely :-(
Not sure what to do about it... we can add a mode for oil:all
to repurpose do
, but I'm not sure it's worth it. It's more complexity.
So basically every call that doesn't use its result has to be preceded with
pass
now:
pass f(x)
pass obj.method()
var y = f(x)
var z = obj.method()
Kind of ugly ... :neutral:
https://github.com/oilshell/oil/commit/dc7a0474b006287f2152b54f78d56df8c3d13281
TODO: Merge this
I just implemented some more Oil language semantics! [1]
In shell (and Python), there's no difference between variable declaration and mutation. These are valid:
declare x=1
declare x=2 # mutates x, "declare" is something of a misnomer
x=2 # better way of mutating x
f() {
local y=1
local y=2 # mutates y
y=2 # better way of mutating y
}
Likewise, z=3
can be any of these 3, depending on the context:
In Oil, there are separate keywords for declaring variables and mutating them.
var x = 1
var x = 2 # error: it's already declared
setvar x = 2 # successful mutation
set x = 2 # I plan to add shopt -s parse-set to take over the 'set' builtin, which can be replaced with `shopt` or `builtin set`
(Ever notice that the set and unset builtins aren't opposites in shell ?!?!)
You can mutate a global from a function:
var myglobal = 'g'
f() {
set myglobal = 'new'
set other = 'foo' # error: not declared yet!
}
Comments appreciated!
[1] https://github.com/oilshell/oil/commit/54754f3e8298bc3c272416eb0fc96946c8fa0694
I just implemented shopt -s parse_set
:
https://github.com/oilshell/oil/commit/277c3525aacad48947124c70a52176f5ee447bc5
Note that shopt -s all:oil
turns on all the parse_*
options.
So now you can do:
var x = 1
set x = 2
setvar x = 3 # don't need this long way
To use the set
builtin, prefix it with builtin
builtin set -o errexit
builtin set -- a b c
Most programs shouldn't need to use the set
builtin in Oil. Of course, shopt -u parse_set
unsets it if desired.
Comments welcome!